🔗 Share this article

Throughout the previous presidential campaign, the former president wooed the electorate with promises to lower costs immediately upon taking office. However, once he assumed office, he seemed to pay minimal focus to affordability issues. All that changed after inflation-weary voters delivered a rebuke at the ballot box. Within days, the Trump administration initiated a slapdash campaign to tackle affordability. Regrettably, the drive has proven a disorganized endeavor—filled with illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and misleading statements.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Supermarket Reality

Just two days after the election, Trump began his cost-reduction push with a poorly received statement: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from billionaire Trump—often associates with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated utter contempt for millions of Americans who struggle when visiting the grocery store. In effect, he ignored their struggles as unimportant, implying they were mistaken about actual costs.

His assertion that everything was “way down” proved highly misleading and dishonest. How could all costs be decreasing when his cherished tariffs were increasing prices? Recent data show banana prices rose 6.9% in the last twelve months, the price of beef climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee jumped by nearly 19%—partly because of import taxes applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, prices rose in five of the six main grocery groups tracked by the Consumer Price Index, including meats, poultry, and fish (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (up 2.8%), and produce (rising slightly).

Contradictions and Falsehoods in Economic Claims

In spite of these numbers, Trump continues to push his big lie about affordability. After the vote, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “prices are way down,” and asserted “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks contradict the fact that general costs have clearly increased after the previous administration. At present, price growth is at a 3% annual rate, that’s half again as much than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, he boasted that fuel costs had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data show they average over three dollars.

Faced with reality and declining opinion polls, advisers evidently warned that his “costs are falling” rhetoric portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from typical Americans. Many citizens are frustrated about rising costs following promises of reductions. In response, aides proposed one quick fix: reduce some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea clashed with the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for American shoppers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Potential Impact

With some tariffs being rolled back on several food items, Trump will probably claim that he has lowered costs once these products begin to fall in price. That would be like an arsonist taking credit for putting out a blaze that he ignited. On another occasion, while speaking fast-food leaders, he stated that “this is the golden age of America” and assured listeners that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to countless households who are struggling—particularly when millions risk losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

Per a survey from October, 74% of Americans believe economic conditions are mediocre or bad, while just a quarter consider them good or excellent. Another poll found that 61% of Americans say Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Economic Reality and Proposed Steps

The treasury secretary, Trump’s chief financial officer, lately contradicted claims of a prosperous era. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the US economy “have contracted.” The manufacturing sector—a priority for the administration—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and lost around 33,000 jobs since January. Citing this weakness, the secretary urged the central bank to cut interest rates—an action that could help affordability.

Reacting to widespread concern about living costs, the president proposed a cash handout of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” For many households in need, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—already alarmed about large shortfalls—will approve such a plan. This idea could raise government expenditure, push up borrowing costs, and potentially drive prices higher by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

A further proposed solution for affordability centered on creating 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. But, reality is that 50-year mortgages would do little to reduce installments—often cutting them by a small amount per month. The downside is that these mortgages could more than double the total interest borrowers pay and slow building home value.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Economic Outlook

In their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have once more blamed the previous president for economic problems, including increasing costs. Spokespeople claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” This is unfounded and untruthful allegations. Actually, the former president handed over a strong economy, with low price growth, solid expansion, and minimal joblessness. But, Trump’s policies—particularly import taxes—have resulted in an economic mess, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

Per Mark Zandi, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are already in recession, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. Zandi fears that if large states such as California and New York tumble into recession, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. In downturns, consumers typically have less money to spend, and price increases usually declines. Sadly, given Trump’s much-ballyhooed affordability campaign likely to do little to control costs, his most effective “tool” for improving living standards might prove to be pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that hard-pressed households cannot handle.