🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly return the bill for further review if he has objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across Europe," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable discussions in other member states